Well you guys have been at this for a while now, I'm just coming along 
To my understanding gdx is actually advocating to use MSX1 Software instead of MSX1.
I haven't seem him talking about a generic Software tag (that's not useful right?)
Note that mars2000 does support a Games category.
I'll remove MSX1 software | Alligata Software | 1984 (software) | PSG sound | Enhanced Games
Do you think the cat Unsafe PSG is fine the way it is?
Don't touch to the specific Scene software, because it's the choice of the developers! You can't understand that, I know it, but the Dutch MSX scene has also his word on this matter.
I don't see them editing the wiki here. Wolf did in the past, and I believe he's not dictating anything.
So I don't think you should / have to be too stringent or rigid about that.
I will not accept the MSX1 Software, MSX2 Software, etc categories.
You will not accept, but what bout the rest? Are you in charge here? (Well, I do believe you took upon you to extend / fix up the Scene Software section right?)
My suggestion is to decide stuff like this in a democratic matter with some people that are involved/care and/or have a good vision (so you, gdx & rderooy?) And perhaps let Grauw be the final judge, if we can't work something out
Anyway, I'm still not sure what it is what gdx finds appropriate exactly
Hey, some change of mind?
You actually like the (a) year category?
Well, can be cool 
Haha why me 
.
Had to put you in the story, now didn't I?
(As the scholar perhaps, and potential impartial party )
Don't touch to the specific Scene software, because it's the choice of the developers! You can't understand that, I know it, but the Dutch MSX scene has also his word on this matter.
I don't see them editing the wiki here. Wolf did in the past, and I believe he's not dictating anything.
So I don't think you should / have to be too stringent or rigid about that.
I made pages for most of the scene persons and groups prior to MRC 2k12 going live. Most of 'm were like stubs, for a very good reason: I prefer the original persons and groups (or otherwise closely related persons) to fill in those pages. I'm not going to guess what anyone's bio could ever be. So, it's not really a case of abandoning the scene-wiki, it's just that it had to start somewhere with a fair amount of content, and it should be filled by those who actually can.
The only thing to keep in mind is the kind of difference between the real Wikipedia and the MRC-wiki. The real Wikipedia is a collection of general information, everyone who knows something about a subject, and has a gap to fill, is entitled to add knowledge. E,g, if some astronomer discovers a new planet in our solar system, than one person can add the new wiki, another can add some about the planet's composition, another person can add new pictures etc. The MRC scene-wike is more like a collection of (auto)biographies, and if you see a fairly detailed page, you can assume that the information is authentic and complete. Regardless of the open nature of a wiki, I'd like to suggest not to screw around with such content. Adding [[links]] 'n such is fine, adding a new production to the list of productions is no problem either. Scrubbing some faulty grammar away is fine as well. But adding to e.g. my biography that I'm the greatest Z80 coder in history, is kind of wrong. 
