Hello everyone.
Today I was just wondering how our different MSXing styles impact upon power consumption.
I guess that the "real" MSX computers are power hungry, but I do not know if there are noticeable differences between different generations, although that I reckon that add-ons, such as disk drives and other upgrades will surely have a big impact. But is more efficient an all-in-one MSX-engine "newer" computer or an old school MSX computer with an array of separated chips?
On the other hand, what about FPGA implementations? I supose that they are more efficient when it comes to power. Are there noticeable differences between them?
And what about a third option, such as emulated MSX on low-power computers, telephones or tablets such as Raspberry Pi/MSXVR, Intel SOCs, RISC CPUs? In this case scenario, the emulator used does impact the power consumption? Shall I prefer WebMSX, openMSX, blueMSX, ruMSX, fMSX, no$msx?
I would really like to confirm all these assumptions with real data, but I do not have the means to test all these. Do you guys think that this could be interesting as a community project? I'd love to know what is the most eco-friendly MSX usage scenario when it comes to power consumption. And I am not talking about CO2 footprint, that would be much more difficult to assess...
Thank you all!